1. Signs of Pseudoscience
via Psychology - From Inquiry to Understanding
An imposter of science is pseudoscience: a set of claims that seem scientific but aren’t. In particular, pseudoscience lacks the safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science. We must be careful to distinguish pseudoscientific claims from metaphysical claims, which as we’ve seen, are untestable and therefore lie outside the realm of science. In principle, at least, we can test pseudoscientific claims, although the proponents of these claims often avoid subjecting them to rigorous examination.
Pseudoscientific and other questionable beliefs are widespread. A recent survey of the U.S. public shows that 41 percent of Americans believe in extrasensory perception (ESP); over 30 percent in haunted houses, ghosts, and telepathy; and 25 percent in astrology (Musella, 2005).
The fact that many Americans entertain the possibility of such beliefs isn’t by itself worrisome, because a certain amount of open-mindedness is essential for scientific thinking. Instead, what’s troubling is that many Americans appear convinced that such claims are correct even though the scientific evidence for them is either weak, as in the case of ESP, or essentially nonexistent, as in the case of astrology. Moreover, it’s troubling that many poorly supported beliefs are more popular, or at least more widespread, than well-supported beliefs. To take merely one example, there are about 20 times as many astrologers as astronomers in the United States (Gilovich, 1991).

    Signs of Pseudoscience

    via Psychology - From Inquiry to Understanding

    An imposter of science is pseudoscience: a set of claims that seem scientific but aren’t. In particular, pseudoscience lacks the safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science. We must be careful to distinguish pseudoscientific claims from metaphysical claims, which as we’ve seen, are untestable and therefore lie outside the realm of science. In principle, at least, we can test pseudoscientific claims, although the proponents of these claims often avoid subjecting them to rigorous examination.

    Pseudoscientific and other questionable beliefs are widespread. A recent survey of the U.S. public shows that 41 percent of Americans believe in extrasensory perception (ESP); over 30 percent in haunted houses, ghosts, and telepathy; and 25 percent in astrology (Musella, 2005).

    The fact that many Americans entertain the possibility of such beliefs isn’t by itself worrisome, because a certain amount of open-mindedness is essential for scientific thinking. Instead, what’s troubling is that many Americans appear convinced that such claims are correct even though the scientific evidence for them is either weak, as in the case of ESP, or essentially nonexistent, as in the case of astrology. Moreover, it’s troubling that many poorly supported beliefs are more popular, or at least more widespread, than well-supported beliefs. To take merely one example, there are about 20 times as many astrologers as astronomers in the United States (Gilovich, 1991).

    1. djp16 reblogged this from myheadisweak
    2. nightsofshadows reblogged this from wh108
    3. wh108 reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    4. meeeowch reblogged this from self-injuryshark and added:
      hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
    5. invisibleskypanda reblogged this from self-injuryshark
    6. summerstormed reblogged this from emir-dynamite
    7. ladydarthcaedus reblogged this from fait-hunter
    8. fait-hunter reblogged this from emir-dynamite
    9. abolished-your-mythology reblogged this from emir-dynamite
    10. emir-dynamite reblogged this from lajacobine
    11. sandythesandwich reblogged this from pruausecutor-beilschmidtten
    12. pruausecutor-beilschmidtten reblogged this from mistspinner
    13. panem-et-circenses reblogged this from imactuallynotdemonic
    14. imactuallynotdemonic reblogged this from stalinistqueens
    15. yttriumrapier reblogged this from stalinistqueens
    16. orestesdrunk reblogged this from stalinistqueens
    17. stalinistqueens reblogged this from lajacobine
    18. lajacobine reblogged this from luminosiity
    19. mistspinner reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    20. dengekirose reblogged this from ashharyu
    21. ashharyu reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    22. ngonyamainduna reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    23. kaitxoxox reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    24. jakeekiss reblogged this from thunderwishes
    25. thunderwishes reblogged this from we-are-star-stuff
    26. luminosiity reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    27. super-rainbows reblogged this from self-injuryshark
    28. xionapplecheeks reblogged this from theonetruenidoking